![]() If you use those features, you may be better sticking with MacDown (or wait until I implement them □). Also Typewriter is a sandboxed app, so by design it cannot access images and other references on the file system apart from the file which is opened to do that you have to create a TextBundle file rather than pure Markdown. I have to say MacDown is still more customizable, with custom fonts and CSS styles for the preview which are not available in my app. There's an index to quickly navigate the document, paired with an Open Quickly panel which allows to select headers with the keyboard There are more shortcuts and helpers for tables and links, and easier formatting toggles (for example, you don't have to manually select a word to apply a style) The live preview has no flashes (there's an optional progress indicator for the updates, but you can disable it), and the scroll is synchronized more reliably The interface is more in line with macOS 11+ style, ![]() Despite the similarities and MacDown being open-source, there's no code in common with my app, which is written in Swift. ![]() I like to think of Typewriter as a more modern version of it. My app is very similar to MacDown, which actually was the editor I used the most before building my own. What would be the main benefits of switching? I’m a daily user of MacDown currently, which is rock solid for me. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |